Skip navigation

Category Archives: Sibelius

To be fair, the new plugin is the same as the old one but with different numbers.  I’m planning on making a Sibelius plugin factory at some point, to allow custom plugins.  For now, though, enjoy the ability to write in 17-tone equal temperament!

Though “temperament” is a bit of a misnomer, because while 17-TET certainly sounds like it has quite a temper, it doesn’t actually temper out anything useful.  Here are the names of the 17 notes of 17-TET:

C Db C# D Eb D# E F Gb F# G Ab G# A Bb A# B (C)

If you’ve read my previous post on the mathematics of diatonic tunings (and actually understood my ramblings), you might remember (or not) that our diatonic 12-tone system depends on two kinds of half steps, the chromatic, from C to C# where the note name doesn’t change, and the diatonic, from C to Db where the note name does change.  The chromatic half step is seven fifths forward in the circle of fifths, and the diatonic half step is five fifths backward in the circle of fifths.  In 12-TET, there are only 12 notes, so those two half steps meet at the same notes, and they’re enharmonic.  C# is the same as Db, just spelled differently.  In other diatonic tunings, though, the chromatic and diatonic half steps have different sizes!  In n-TET, the circle of fifths has n notes.  Each diatonic half step steps backwards 5 fifths, and each chromatic one steps forward 7 fifths, so if your chromatic and diatonic half steps meet after c chromatic ones and d diatonic ones, there are n = 7c + 5d notes in the circle of fifths.  Heh, like that derivation?  Anyway, one of the values of n is 17, where equivalence is reached in 1 chromatic and two diatonic half steps because c = 1 and d = 2.  1 chromatic half step from B is B#; 1 diatonic half step is C and two is Db.  In 17-TET, B# = Db.  Kinda weird, isn’t it?  c and d are also the sizes of the intervals in 17-TET steps.  The chromatic half step is 1 17-TET step and the diatonic is two.  This explains the weird order evident in the note names.  I excluded double flats and double sharps (as well as Cb, E#, Fb, B#), but it’s easy to see where they go.

Problem number 1 with 17-TET: the major triad.  Let’s look at the cent values: the major third is 423.5 cents and the fifth is 705.9 cents.  12-TET has 400 and 700, and JI has 386.3 and 702.0.  The fifth is a little sharp — not much sharper than the 12-TET fifth is flat.  You barely notice it if at all.  But the third is 23.5 cents sharper than 12-TET and a ridiculous 37 cents sharper than JI!  It resembles a major third but it’s REALLY out of tune.  19-TET has a pretty close fifth as well, but its major third is 378.9 cents, closer to JI than 12-TET.  When you hear a major chord in 19-TET, it’s very consonant; in 17-TET, it’s an elementary school class of violinists.

So, you have to wonder: how would the second movement of Beethoven’s Sonata No. 8 “Pathetique” sound in 17-TET?  Well, it’s fairly odd that you were wondering that, but that’s OK because it’s right here:

Sonata No. 8 – II (12-TET)

Sonata No. 8 – II (17-TET)

Sonata No. 8 – II (19-TET)

These recordings were made in Sibelius; the 17-TET and 19-TET recordings using my plugins for the respective purposes.  It’s really easy to retune: select all, apply the plugin, done.  (So long as you wrote the music with one note in a staff at a time, anyway; I also had to transcribe the E major section as being in Fb major to keep spellings correct.)  Hopefully they give a good sense of how 17-TET works.

And that is that it doesn’t.

17-TET is AWFUL for tonal music.  Most of the piece is beautiful major chords, and if there’s one thing that sounds awful in 17-TET, it’s major chords.  Minor chords aren’t as bad.  17-TET does have a neutral third that sounds good, the D# (which is the same as Ed, E half-flat).  However, 12-TET does not have a neutral third, so Beethoven wasn’t gonna use it!

Note that 19-TET sounds considerably better.  The intervals that most diverge from their 12-TET counterparts are the half steps, both diatonic and chromatic (12-TET: 100 cents, 19-TET diatonic: 126 cents, 19-TET chromatic: 63 cents, 17-TET diatonic: 71 cents, 17-TET chromatic: 141 cents).  The sonata movement has a few chromatic passages, and it’s really obvious.  17-TET deals pretty well with leading tones, actually, which 19-TET doesn’t, but 17-TET makes up for it by totally destroying the major triad.  19-TET has better major triads than 12-TET!

Of course, you can write great music in 17-TET.  You can; I haven’t yet.  I will post when (and if) I do.  One thing that is painfully obvious upon hearing retunings of 12-TET music is that music conceived in 12-TET probably sounds better in 12-TET, and other ideas need to be worked out for other tuning systems.  With the Offtonic 17-TET plugin for Sibelius, you can play as you will!

Two more plugins; get them here!

UPDATE: You can also get them at the Sibelius website here and here.

Remove MIDI Pitch Bends just removes MIDI pitch bends, which is pretty useful if you bend a lot of pitches.  Offtonic 19-TET, on the other hand, is, in my humble opinion, a giant leap for microtonal composition!  …OK, my opinion may not be so humble.  It is, however, very cool, at least to a microtonal nerd like myself.  I’ll analyze the 19-TET scale in detail in a later post, with musical examples that I created using this very plugin, but for now, enjoy composing in 12-TET’s closest microtonal cousin!

Normally I’d also talk about the challenges I faced when writing these plugins, but honestly, it wasn’t so hard.  I looked at existing plugins to get an idea of the idioms, I looked at the .plg file in a text editor to see how the script was stored, and I wrote.  I would, however, be very glad to answer any questions about ManuScript, the plugin language.  Don’t be afraid to ask in the comments.

EDIT: It’s now available at the Sibelius website, too!

My first Sibelius plugin has been released!  This deserves an exclamation point because it’s SO COOL!!!!!!!1  Check it out:

Offtonic Plugins for Sibelius

…Didn’t really deserve that exclamation point, did it?  Well, TIL that making plugins for Sibelius is really, really easy.  The ManuScript scripting language that it uses is quite simple (though its differences from, say, Javascript are kind of annoying, like the single equals sign for comparisons).  My one complaint about the process is the horrible and buggy coding environment, but I hear that’s fixed in the new version of Sibelius, which I don’t have.

Read More »